PROFESSOR ALI SUKHANVER
The Indian government is in a habit of using its own militants to kidnap and kill the foreign tourists and blamePakistanfor this heinous act of terrorism particularly in the paradise likevalleyofKashmir. For more than half a century Kashmiris have been suffering a lot due to the extremely brutal Indian occupation. Since 1988 over 80 000 civilians including women and children have died at the hands of the Indian army and paramilitary forces. The people ofKashmirare being punished for their desire of liberty and independence. Their crime is they wantIndiato end the brutal occupation ofKashmir, their homeland. More pathetic is the fact that their basic human right of freedom is always being neglected and ignored by the world peace makers and even by the UNO. It is onlyPakistanwhich stands by the people ofKashmirin their war against inhuman brutal Indian occupation.
The people of Kashmirare entangled into the unseen strings of politics of terrorism. The government of Indiawhich claims to be the care-taker of their basic human rights, is itself involved in the violation of these rights. High rank military officers posted there in the occupied valley of Kashmir are busy in planning how to make the lives of the Kashmiri people more painful whereas the lower military officials are doing all their best to act upon their plans. To counter the struggle for independence in occupied Kashmir, the government of Indiahas introduced different terrorist groups in the garb of Islamist extremist organizations. These fake organizations not only disrepute the preaching and teaching of Islam but also generate hatred against those who are actually busy in the real war against Indian atrocities in the valleyof Kashmir. The story of kidnapping of six western tourists in 1995 as exposed by Adrian Levy & Catherine Scott-Clark is also same type of story. By adopting such immoral and unethical tactics, Indiais killing two birds with one stone; on one hand she is crushing the freedom movement and on the other hand she is shifting all blame onto Pakistan. And such tactics are surely not the new ones; India has been firing all her blame-shots towardsPakistan since independence in 1947. And ironically,Pakistan is not the only target of this blame game;Pakistan’s all weather friendChina also has to face the bullets of this stray firing.
According to a recently issued report,Indiahas erected an impenetrable wire along its border withPakistanand the Line of Control inKashmir. Yet, for each security failure of seven million strong Indian military forces inKashmir,Indiafinds an easy scapegoat in form of “cross-border terrorism” fromPakistan. Instead of wasting all her zeal and zest in playing blame game againstPakistan,Indiacould have made situation far better by concentrating upon the remedy of actual issues which compel the people to revolt against the government. The matter of the fact is that it is not only thevalleyofKashmirwhere people are striving to get freedom; there are numerous states where struggle for freedom and liberty is going on. Naxilite movement and the uprising for freedom in seven north-eastern states is no more a hidden story. Even Dr. Manmohan Singh, the honourable prime minister ofIndiaonce admitted in 2009 talking to the media men thatIndiais facing the worst threat from the Naxilite movement. He said with severe distress and anguish, “Naxilite movement is the biggest internal security threat forIndia.” The seven north-eastern states includingArunachal Pradesh,Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura are also the worst example ofIndia’s home-grown terrorism. These states cover an area of about 250,000 km2 which amounts to 7 percent ofIndia’s total area and about 3.8 percent ofIndia’s total population. A continuous state of disturbance and disorder in such a vast area could never be a negligible reality. Instead of targetingPakistan,Indiamust pay attention to this ‘biggest internal security threat’. Indian authorities must also be aware of the nexus between the Indian security forces personnel and the so-called militants they claim to fight against; with the passage of time this coordination is getting stronger.